Our Strengths
Homestead Services and Credit Restoration, DBA © 2006 – all rights reserved |
| "I am ready to help you protect your home or restore your credit! Please call me today !! |
| Understanding the "Attorney / Client " Relationship Has your attorney ever told you this?? Corpus Juris Secundum ("The Body of Law") legal encyclopedia, volume 7, section 4: which mean "The Body of Law" or Legal encyclopedia, Volume 7, Section 4: as quoted: "Attorney & client: An Attorney's "first" duty is to the Courts (1st) and the public (2nd) and not to the client (3rd), and wherever the duties to an attorney's client "conflict" with those interests that he/she owes his allegiance to, as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter". The Biggest problem today is that People do not know their own rights & blindly entrust their rights to someone else. What is the legal relationship between an attorney and his/her client? What is a "ward of the court"? Better read the following, particularly "...because if pleaded by an attorney....." Conclusions of law: 1. When you hire an attorney, you become a ward of the court and a second class citizen and you admit the jurisdiction of the court in the matter at hand. 2. You can't hire an attorney if you want to challenge jurisdiction. 3. If you want to challenge jurisdiction, the only way you can do it is as a "sui juris" and/or "in propria persona". *Please note: We always encourage any client to discuss any legal issues regarding any personal or business situation with a board certified attorney, trained in a specific area of law, in their domiciled state. Furthermore, all clients are fully disclosed that "we" are not lawyers and are required to sign a disclosure is stating such that has been provided by the member's union of Florida Bar Association addressing "non-attorneys" These issues are directly sited in numerous legal references and articles written by non-related parties and may be deemed as opinions and does not reflect the opinion of HSFL Copyright Chris Hansen ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1. To what or whom is an attorney's first duty? We consult the latest Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.) legal encyclopedia, volume 7, section 4 for the answer below: 2. What is the legal relationship between an attorney and his/her client? 3. What is a ward of the court? (Are you an infant or person of unsound mind?) 4. Do you need to challenge jurisdiction? Better read the following, particularly "...Because if pleaded by an attorney....." Conclusions of law: 1.. When you hire an attorney, you become a ward of the court and a second class citizen and you admit the jurisdiction of the court in the matter at hand. 2.. You can't hire an attorney if you want to challenge jurisdiction. 3.. If you want to challenge jurisdiction, the only way you can do it is as a "sui juris" and/or "in propria persona". ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ All we would add is that people need to also learn the difference between "represented" status and "Inherent Rights". How "pro se" literally means "represent myself" which is impossible - you ARE yourself; that the goal of the court is to keep everyone in a "represented" status, not telling you that you are not in a court of constitutional judicial due process in law. You STAND - in the court, Our courtrooms and Public record, Claiming Living Breathing Un-a-lein-able God Given Sovereign Authority, Exercising and Establishing BY YOUR PRESENCE the lawful jurisdiction. AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 B. The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) II. The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court: ONLY authorizes, 1. To practice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. 2. Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT. 3. INFANTS, PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4. 4. STATING THAT A "CERTIFICATE" IS NOT A LICENSE.... A. To practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION. B. Nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM C. The "STATE BAR" CARD IS NOT A LICENSE D. It is a "UNION DUES CARD" E. The "BAR" is a "PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION." - Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE. It is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION. 1. See Attorney General Dan Morales' letter. 2. As per this letter; the State does not issue licenses and they are not issued by his office. IV. The State Bar is; A. An Unconstitutional Monopoly, Article 1, Section 26, Texas Bill of Rights. B. A ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE; C. Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution. D. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive as the BAR and SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS are doing. ALL MEMBERS OF BOTH ARE MONOPOLISTIC BAR MEMBERS! E. In violation of the RIGHT TO WORK LAWS of Texas. V. State Bar Rules. . . at Article III, Section 2. . . Enrollment in the State Bar: "Each person who becomes licensed to practice law is REQUIRED TO ENROLL IN THE STATE BAR WITHIN 10 DAYS "BEFORE" OR "AFTER" RECEIVING A LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW. ENROLLMENT IN THE BAR AND LICENSE ARE NOT THE SAME. THE BAR CAN NOT LICENSE ANYONE. The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer. They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various other offices in the State. Only the Bar Association or their designated committees can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar. On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee's, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot. This is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers. |