|
Disclaimer: DISCLAIMER: Homestead Services & Credit Restoration, D.B.A./ has fully disclosed to me/us that they/he is a non-lawyer and may not give legal and/or tax advice, cannot tell me what my rights or remedies are, cannot tell me how to testify in court, and cannot represent me in court. I was first advised, at my own discretion and choice, to connect any state Bar-Member attorney by Homestead Services & Credit Restoration, D.B.A.. It has been fully disclosed to me/us the difference between legal information and legal advice. The use of any information contained herein, such as opinions, instructions, suggestions, advice, letters and other similar content is at the user's own risk. You are encouraged to consult with a Bar attorney in your state of domicile for legal advise prior to making any decision that could have legal or financial consequences to you. NOTICE: The following is not to be construed as or converted into legal advice. It is for informational use only AS PROTECTED UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT "FREEDOM OF SPEECH". Homestead Services and Credit Restoration, DBA © 2006 – all rights reserved Warning: All information is copy-written and protected. All violators will be prosecuted. $50,000 per claim. Our legal research team, representatives, independent contractors do not give tax, insurance or legal advice unless in possession of the required license issued by the state of Florida nor does any person, representing HSFL to be presumed as to be practicing law in the state of Florida that is not dually licensed to practice law in the state of Florida and a member of the Florida Bar Association. HSFL is a service filing entity serving the Florida Homeowner. Under no circumstance, is any natural person, independent contractor, employee, member, affiliate, associate, etc. with HSFL is to provide any legal, tax, or insurance advise to the general public unless that entity is proper licensed to offer such service or services pursuant to F.S. 454.23 Penalties. -- Any person not licensed or otherwise authorized to practice law in this state who practices law in this state or holds himself or herself out to the public as qualified to practice law in this state, or who willfully pretends to be, or willfully takes or uses any name, title, addition, or description implying that he or she is qualified, or recognized by law as qualified, to practice law in this state, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. History.--s. 21, ch. 10175, 1925; CGL 8133; s. 384, ch. 71-136; s. 1, ch. 74-128; s. 184, ch. 97-103; s. 1, ch. 2004-287. The "client" operates in their own "Pro-Se" capacity in the preparation of their own personal, self executing documents needed and as set forth and required by the Florida Constitution in order to properly protect their domiciled homestead property. Under no circumstances is any party associated with HSFL is to be deemed or misconstrued as providing legal advise or the unlawful practice of law or holds himself or herself out to the public as qualified to practice law in this state, or who willfully pretends to be, or willfully takes or uses any name, title, addition, or description implying that he or she is qualified, or recognized by law as qualified, to practice law in this state. We always recommend for any client to discuss any legal, tax or insurance with a state certified attorney - we do not give legal or tax advise. Disclosures are provided which contains the following provisions: (Name) told a consumer that he/she is a non-lawyer and may not give legal advice, cannot tell a consumer what their rights are or remedies are, cannot tell a consumer how to testify in court, and cannot represent a consumer in court. Governing Law and Forum for Disputes. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Florida, USA as they apply to agreements made and solely performed therein. You irrevocably consent and waive all objections to personal jurisdiction and venue in the state and federal courts located in Florida, USA, and you shall not commence or prosecute any suite or action except in the foregoing courts. No Assignment. You may not resell, transfer, assign, sub-license, delegate or otherwise dispose of any rights, license or obligations under this Agreement to any other person or entity, including without limitation by operation of law or otherwise. Without limiting the foregoing, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. Severability. Any provision of this Agreement which is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall be severable from this Agreement in that jurisdiction without in any way invalidating the remaining provisions of this Agreement. The unenforceability of any provision in a given jurisdiction shall not make that provision unenforceable in any other jurisdiction. "Intellectual Property Rights" means any patent, copyright, rights in Trademarks, trade secret rights, moral rights and other intellectual property or proprietary rights arising under the laws of any jurisdiction. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. IN NO EVENT WILL HOMESTEAD SERVICES OF FLORIDA, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, AFFILIATES, SUBSIDIARIES, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR OTHER INDIRECT (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, COST OF COVER OR LOST PROFITS) ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY SERVICES, CONTENT OR OTHER MATERIALS PROVIDED OR AVAILABLE HEREUNDER, EVEN IF HOMESTEAD SERVICES OF FLORIDA IS EXPRESSLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES AROSE IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHER LEGAL BASIS. THE TERM "DAMAGES" INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ATTORNEY FEES, ANY LOST PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION. YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE ECONOMIC TERMS OF OUR AGREEMENT REFLECT THE FOREGOING ALLOCATION OF RISK AND SUCH ALLOCATION OF RISK IS A SIGNIFICANT INDUCEMENT FOR HOMESTEAD SERVICES OF FLORIDA TO PROVIDE THE SERVICES, AND OTHER CONTENT AND MATERIALS. THIS PROVISION SHALL APPLY EVEN IF ANY REMEDY FAILS OF ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE. All information contained in this website is the private property of Homestead Services of Florida and the owner. Any unauthorized reproduction, duplication, replication, copying, photo-copying, carbon-copy, imitation of any documents or forms originally created and deemed to be the private property by any related or unrelated parties, direct or indirectly, may constitute civil and/or criminal damages against such parties and all related costs involving such litigation with a minimum claim of $50,000. I fully understand and agree any and all terms and conditions disclosed forthwith. Pursuant The Bill of Rights of the National Constitution, in particular, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Ninth Amendments, and the Florida Constitution, pursuant to F.S. 817.5681, F.S. 626.9651, F.S. 934.01, F.S. 934.02 F.S. 497.381, F. S. 400.494, F.S. 90.507, F.S. 679.1021, F.S. 195.11, F.S. 688.008, F.S. 768.042, 45 C.F.R. ss. 160.102, 160.103, and 164, subpart A, Privacy Act of 1974, Privacy Protection Act (PPA) of 1980, Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986, US Supremacy Clause, 41 Am.Jur. 925, Prosser on Torts, 1941 ed., 1050, 138 A.L.R. 22-110, Eldredge, Modern Tort Problems, 77, and the Restatement of Torts §867. Adopting the definition at 138 A. L.R. 25, Cason v. Baskin, 20 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1944), 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1686, 40 L. Ed. 2d 90 (1974); May, 752 F.2d at 1303, Marler v. Missouri State Bd. of Optometry, 102 F.3d 1453, 1456 (8th Cir. 1996), Belton v. Board of Police Comm'rs. of Kansas City, 708 S.W.2d 131, 136-37 (Mo. 1986) (en banc), Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 541, 105 S. Ct. 1487, 1491, 84 L. Ed. 2d 494 (1985); [**7] see also Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 344, 96 S. Ct. 2074, 48 L. Ed. 2d 684 (1976), Munden v. Harris, 153 Mo. App. 652, 134 S.W. 1076, 1081 (Mo. Ct. App. 1911), Balke v. Ream, 33 S.W.3d 589, 2000 WL 1575268, *5 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000) (citing Childs v. Williams, 825 S.W.2d 4, 7 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)), Y.G. v. Jewish Hosp. of St. Louis, 795 S.W.2d 488, 499-500 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990), Dawson v. Associates Fin. Serv. Co. of Kansas, 529 P.2d 104 (Kan. 1974); see also Jackson v. Peoples Fed. Credit Union, 604 P.2d 1025 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979, United States v. Bressler, 772 F.2d 287, 293 (7th Cir. 1985), 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3), . O'Donnell v. United States, 891 F.2d 1079, 1084-85 (3d Cir. 1989); cf. Alexander v. FBI, 971 F. Supp. 603, 610-11 (D.D.C. 1997) Hager v. United States, No. 86-3555, slip op. at 7-8 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 20, 1987), Tripp v. United States, 257 F. Supp. 2d 37, 45 (D.D.C. 2003, Bivens" suit. See Griffin v. Ashcroft, No. 02-5399, 2003 WL 22097940, at *2 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 3, 2003), Chung v. United States Dep't of Justice, 333 F.3d 273, 274 (D.C. Cir. 2003), Downie v. City of Middleburg Hts., 301 F.3d 688, 696 (6th Cir. 2002), Newmark v. Principi, 262 F. Supp. 2d 509, 518-19 (E.D. Pa. 2003); Khalfani v. Sec'y, VA, No. 94-CV-5720, 1999 WL 138247, at *7 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 1999), No. 99-6140 (2d Cir. Oct. 10, 2000); Fares v. INS, 29 F. Supp. 2d 259, 262 (W.D.N.C. 1998); Sullivan v. USPS, 944 F. Supp. 191, 195-96 (W.D.N.Y. 1996); Hughley v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 94-1048, slip op. at 5 (D.D.C. Apr. 30, 1996), aff'd sub nom. Hughley v. Hawks, No. 96-5159, 1997 WL 362725 (D.C. Cir. May 6, 1997); Blazy v. Woolsey, No. 93-2424, 1996 WL 43554, at *1 (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 1996), subsequent decision sub nom. Blazy v. Tenet, 979 F. Supp. 10, 27 (D.D.C. 1997), summary affirmance granted, No. 97-5330, 1998 WL 315583 (D.C. Cir. May 12, 1998); Williams v. VA, 879 F. Supp. 578, 585-87 (E.D. Va. 1995); Mangino v. Dep't of the Army, No. 94-2067, 1994 WL 477260, at *9 (D. Kan. Aug. 24, 1994); Mittleman v. United States Treasury, 773 F. Supp. 442, 454 (D.D.C. 1991); see also Patterson v. FBI, 705 F. Supp. 1033, 1045 n.16 (D.N.J. 1989) 893 F.2d 595 (3d Cir. 1990). Doe v. United States Civil Serv. Comm'n, 483 F. Supp. 539, 564-75 (S.D.N.Y. 1980), Alexander, 971 F. Supp. at 610-11, Doe v. Veneman, 230 F. Supp. 2d 739, 752 (W.D. Tex. 2002) |